Moving from 'Learning' to solving a 'Real Business Issue'
Focus on solving a business issue
Learning returns the highest benefit when it is properly applied to solving real business problems. We recommend the line manager and the employee agree on measurable goals that will address known business issues.
The employee might then need to attend a development program such as this workshop. The objective is not just to attend a workshop, but rather to increase the employee’s business and financial acumen, and as a direct result of this development program, identify and help achieve specific, measurable, value-creating performance goals. To illustrate moving from learning-related goals to performance-related goals, we have prepared the following suggestions, which of course should be modified to meet the specific needs of the line manager and employee.
A business issue is on the table
Manager asks employee to solve the business issue
Training takes place with the issue in mind
Employee focuses on solving the issue
Employee reports outcome
Issue needs to be solved asap
Employee is unclear how to do that
Definition of KPIs to solve the issue
Training will be recommended to help solve the issue
Maybe a workshop
Maybe on-line
Employee addresses the issue with the newly acquainted knowledge
Employee shares how it was possible to meet the KPIs
Issue is solved
Value creating performance
Value-Creating Goal
Using your knowledge from analyzing Swiss Re’s balance sheet, determine the requirements to achieve and maintain the current rating. Present your findings to your line manager and/or team.
Suggested application tasks in order to meet the above-mentioned goal
With this new knowledge develop two tangible suggestions to present to your line manager and/or team, which could include:
What actions might raise or lower Swiss Re’s rating, and
Assess the impact of that action on the rating and present a case for or against taking these steps.
Summary
Addressing business issues - in a context of learning - promises to produce impressive ROIs.
When we consider all the benefits and costs, this type of training/development investment creates significant value and provides impressive quantifiable returns, both for the employee and for Swiss Re. Therefore, this approach moves us far beyond "just learning something"; it focuses us on the positive business outcomes by quantifying the expected costs and resulting value creation.
Our Thoughts – the Return on Investment (ROI) Calculation
This activity promises a strong ROI of 170%
The sections below reveal our calculation.
Select each thought (+) to learn more about it.
Quantifiable value: Assume that the time saving impact after this training intervention can be translated into the following, each year:
Time savings for employee – 24 hours for the year (US$170 per hour).
This equates to a total estimated 24 hours saved for every participant who attends the one-day workshop. This can be translated into a quantifiable yearly saving for each participant of approximately US$4,080 (24 hours x US$170).
Non-quantifiable value: Besides this measurable value, there are also non-quantitative benefits of this training. Competency gain and improvement of the individual participant which can translate into numerous benefits for both the employee and Swiss Re, which often materializes over time. With the current weighted average cost of capital of Swiss Re at 1.88%, any contribution by participants to reducing this figure will only go to enhance the shareholder value creation.
Assume the cost of participating in the half-day training is US$300 which is the Swiss Re average cost.
Also assume the opportunity cost for being away from the desk for half a day is US$700. Further assume one day of work is required to apply the findings and to achieve the above-mentioned performance goal, which adds an additional US$1,400 opportunity cost for not being productive.
Therefore, the total cost of this learning investment is assumed to be US$2,400 (US$300 + US$700 + US$1,400).
The ROI in this case equates to a high 170% (US$4,080/US$2,400).
Don’t forget this ROI calculation is not considering the above-mentioned non-quantifiable value.
Additional savings could result since the savings could reoccur in subsequent years and the learnings from the workshop could be applied to other situations. In your own individual case, the numbers may differ, our intention here is to offer an example for creating your own ROI calculations.
Agree on your goal
Structured learning
Social learning
On-the-job learning
Select each light blue number to discover more.
Talk with your manager - Agree on an outcome based goal.
Prepare online.
Who is this for?
All job types and bands
Competency level:
Completing the training options will raise the competency level to "basic". Completing the "20%" and "70%" actions will raise the competency level from "basic" to approaching "proficient".
We suggest using the text below for your development goal:
"To be regarded as the person in your area who is able to explain the ways in which rating agencies make decisions, the way ratings impact Swiss Re, and the steps the company can and should take to manage its ratings"
Avoid: Attend workshop xyz
What are the requirements?
Finance background is not required
Class based. Get the basics quickly.
Virtual Workshop: "Rating agencies"
Duration: 2 hours
Description: This workshop provides insight into how Swiss Re manages its relationship with the rating agencies. It introduces the main rating agencies and the rating criteria to assess the financial strength of re/insurers. It explains rating types and methodologies and provides a high level introduction on capital models. The workshop shows how rating agencies assess the reinsurance industry in general and Swiss Re in particular
Objectives: This program enables participants to:
Understand the distinctions between credit ratings and ratings of claims paying abilities
Understand the importance of ratings with regard to the company’s business opportunities as well as its standing in financial markets
List the elements of the rating methodology and insurance rating framework used by Standard & Poor’s (S&P)
Outline the main components of the S&P’s capital models (ICM) such as available capital, required capital and excess /deficient capital
Describe Moody’s rating approach and methodology for reinsurers
Outline AM Best rating methodology including the key components of the capital model (BCAR)
Registration: Direct link to iCampus to register for the workshop: Rating agencies
Articulate the nature of the impact of ratings on an insurance company and discuss your findings with a knowledgeable peer to deepen your understanding
Articulate the specific things a company can do to maintain or raise its rating and explain that to a junior employee on your team. (Learning by teaching)
Schedule several lunches with someone from the rating agency team and use these lunches as an opportunity to discuss selected ratings topics
Assess the relevance of qualitative (soft) factors such as management skills in shaping the company’s rating. Discuss this with a knowledgeable peer and ask for their point of view
Practical assignments. Apply. Create value.
Recommended on-the-job assignments
Research and write a one-page summary of who’s who among rating agencies, describing who the players are, what is the hierarchy in the industry, and what are the specialties of the various rating agencies. Share this summary with a member of the rating agency team and get their feedback
Refine your approach and prepare and deliver an analysis of rating agencies to your manager, explaining who the agency players are, what they do, and how they do it, etc.
Read several rating agency documents to learn precisely how they arrive at their ratings and present your findings to your manager or mentor
Analyse the balance sheet requirements of achieving and maintaining particular ratings, determine what actions might raise or lower a company’s rating and share your thoughts in your next team meeting
Develop an analysis of a specific action at the company that would have a direct impact on ratings. Then assess the impact of that action on a rating and present a case for or against taking these steps. Present your findings to a XFT Leader